Free to use, quality assured, comprehensive coverage of religion and worldviews. Warranted Christian Belief is a book written by Alvin Plantinga and published in 2000 (Oxford University Press). The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Memories are hardly scientifically proven and yet we believe them and rely on them. In short, the standard that people make when critics suggest Christian theism unreasonable, is so high than many everyday beliefs would also fail the test. A person has (or can have) knowledge and belief, but also affections, loves, and hates; a person, furthermore, also has or … How much meets the classical conditions for being properly basic? Performance & security by Cloudflare, Please complete the security check to access. I believe that I had cornflakes for breakfast, that my wife was amused at some little stupidity of mine, that there really are such ‘external objects’ as trees and squirrels, and that the world was not created ten minutes ago with all its dusty books, apparent memories, crumbling mountains, and deeply carved canyons. Finally, Plantinga explores the idea of warrant. If nothing in our experience can be identified as God then God refers to nothing. © 2020 Culham St. Gabriel's Trust. However Christians give accounts of perceiving God, in ways such as those recorded in the Bible – through the burning bush to Moses. The philosopher of religion, Alvin Plantinga, in his book Warranted Christian Belief advances a detailed account of the rationality of religious, and especially Christian, theistic belief. This is a rehashing of secularity. He explores the question, is Christian belief intellectually acceptable? Please accept cookies for optimal performance. The idea that religious belief is some sort of illness or irrational stance, is not uncommon in Western Europe. Of course there are those who argue that God is in fact an imaginative human construct, and that our use of the word ‘God’ is in fact associated with a human idea or symbol but that such an idea could not create the world or be omniscient. This website uses cookies in order to offer you the most relevant information. He continues to explore classic arguments against Christian belief (which he calls defeaters) and makes counter-cases. Summary. He suggests that this lays down a standard that the very argument itself cannot meet. The idea that religious belief is some sort of illness or irrational stance, is not uncommon in Western Europe. He explores the idea that theism is rationally acceptable only if there are good arguments for it. What, exactly, is the question? If you are on a personal connection, like at home, you can run an anti-virus scan on your device to make sure it is not infected with malware. If God is part of the noumenal realm, rather than the phenomenal realm, and if we can only access the phenomenal realm, then how can it be possible to perceive God? He considers those who argue that religious belief is wish fulfillment (Freud), or some sort of dysfunction (Marx). The book is the third volume of a series by Plantinga discussing the warrant (i.e. It constitutes, after Warrant: The Current Debate and Warrant and proper function, both published in 1993, the last part of his trilogy on epistemology. the plausibility and believability) of Christianity. Reg Charity No: 309671. He is not addressing the question of whether it is true or false, but whether it is reasonable, or rational to hold. It seems unreasonable to place on such a God the inability to make himself felt in some way. He suggests that this treats religion like a scientific hypothesis, but questions whether that is reasonable.